Mobile Home park threatens eviction for interfering with flood plans

by David Frey, Aspen Daily News Correspondent

GLENWOOD SPRINGS — Management at the River Meadows mobile home park met with city and county officials on Thursday to begin working out plans to protect residents in the event of a flood. The meeting followed sharp criticism from some residents and Glenwood City Council members for their cutting down dozens of cottonwood trees along the banks, apparently unnecessarily, to make way for a concrete berm they might not be allowed to build.

In response to that criticism, resident manager Karen Price distributed a terse warning to residents not to stand in the way of flood mitigation work.

“Any interference, harassment or assaults on Management, Park personnel and/or Contractors involved in the flood mitigation program … will be cause for eviction,” Price wrote in a memo to residents last week. “There will be no second chance. One strike and your (sic) gone. This is very serious business and not a field trip regarding environmental concerns.”

Resident Deborah Hord, the most outspoken critic of the park’s plans, called the letter a “threat note.”

“I feel that they’re stepping on our civil rights in a lot of ways,” Hord said. “I know that threats are a legal issue. This tree issue is just the icing on the cake, ruining everything.”

Several residents of the mobile home park on the banks of the Roaring Fork became concerned last month when crews appeared in their backyards with chain saws and heavy machinery to remove 40-50 cottonwoods and other trees along the river.

Mayor Bruce Christensen and City Councilman Russ Arensman visited the property, and after seeing the destruction, asked city staffers to look into a possible tree protection ordinance that would prevent similar future incidents.

Price said she and park owner Joe Corda were worried about the threats to residents from rising flood waters due to the above-average snowpack. They had planned to put in a concrete berm, she said, until they found out that city and federal restrictions might not allow that.

“The Owner and Managing Partner, Joe Corda, is being pro-active to protect your safety and your homes,” Price wrote. She said residents willing to help with flood mitigation efforts would be compensated with rent credits “after the flood waters recede.”

She did not return a message seeking comment.

How much flooding comes is a matter of debate, and a matter of time. Recent predictions call for a peak of about 10,000 cubic feet per second, said Glenwood Springs Community Development Director Andrew McGregor, one of the officials who met with park representatives on Thursday. That’s less than in 1995, when some 12,000 cfs rushed down the river, but caused only minor flooding in the park.

Such flood waters probably would not require any barriers to be installed, McGregor said, but according to a 1995 agreement, the park would have to move out recreational vehicles that are parked in the flood area if the waters exceed 10,000 cfs.

The flooding could be much higher, though, McGregor said. Recent cool temperatures have made for a slow, steady runoff so far, but if the same weather lingers into June, when temperatures often soar, it could cause lots of snow melting fast and unusually high waters.

“There is the potential for a lot more water than anyone has seen in recent decades,” McGregor said.

A so-called 100-year flood is considered 21,000 cfs in that area, he said.

Park managers met with McGregor and emergency personnel as part of a series of discussions about how to protect residents in the event of massive flooding. They plan to finalize their plans before another meeting in 10 days.

“The owners seem very conscientious, in my mind, trying to protect the residents,” McGregor said. “They’re just trying to figure out what they can do sensibly.”

However, the tree cutting didn’t help in terms of flood mitigation because of the bank stabilization that tree roots provide.

“Hopefully, everyone now knows the benefit of having a healthy riparian corridor,” he said. “It does far more good than it ever does harm. From that perspective, they’ve neither helped themselves nor anyone downstream.”


dfrey@aspendailynews.com